机构地区: 华南师范大学教育科学学院心理应用研究中心
出 处: 《心理科学进展》 2012年第7期963-970,共8页
摘 要: 时间信息的加工一直是当代阅读心理研究的热点。以往研究对时间信息表征的性质、维度特征、提取机制等问题存在诸多争论,主要表现为强印象假设与场景理论的冲突。我们认为,文本阅读中时间信息的加工包括两个阶段:加工时间词以及低水平的更新情景模型阶段和通达与整合先前信息阶段,强印象假设和场景理论争论的实质在于前者解释的是加工的第一个阶段,而后者解释的是加工的第二个阶段,因此,总是难以调和。本项目首先在更高的理论层面上将二者加以整合,然后采用经典的认知心理学研究方法与现代的眼动研究技术相结合的方法,通过对文本阅读中时间信息表征性质、加工的维度特征、提取过程的激活与抑制特征等问题的探讨,为本项目提出的时间信息加工的二阶段模型提供行为实验与眼动实验证据,从而解决该领域中强印象假设与场景理论的长期争论。本项目的理论构想与研究技术对文本阅读其他问题的探讨具有重要的方法论意义。 The processing of temporal information has been a hot topic in contemporary reading psychology Previous researches results were inconsistent on the nature, the dimensional features, and the retrieval mechanism of temporal information. The Strong Iconicity Assumption and the Scenario Model were the most significant accounts on this problem. This study assumes that there are two stages during the processing of temporal information. The first stage is to process time words and the updating of a situation model, and the second stage is to access and integrate the previous information. According to the Two-Phase Model, the Strong Iconicity Assumption corresponds with the first stage, while the Scenario Model explains the second stage. That is to say, these two models account for the different stage of temporal processing. That is the possible reason why they can not come to an agreement. We try' to integrate these two accounts in terms of the Two-Phase Model. In this study, we used classic experimental methods of cognitive psychology andeye tracking technique to explore the nature of temporal information representation, the dimensional features, and the activation and inhibition mechanism in the retrieval process. All of these experiments provide behavioral and eye-tracking evidences for the Two-Phase Model. Therefore, we solved the disagreement between the Strong Iconicity Assumption and the Scenario Model. The study provides theoretical and methodological implications for the solving of some other issues in text reading.