作 者: ;
机构地区: 浙江工商大学法学院
出 处: 《河北法学》 2011年第9期118-123,共6页
摘 要: 发达国家与发展中国家在相互协商的基础上构建了现代国际投资仲裁体制,克服了外交保护和当地救济的不足。但是,晚近国际投资仲裁程序出现了正当性危机。其中仲裁员缺乏独立性尤为突出。因为仲裁员是国际投资争端的裁决者,是案件公正处理的保证,是整个国际投资仲裁程序顺利进行的核心因素。因此,应该构建常设性国际投资仲裁机构,避免仲裁员与案件的利益冲突,同时应该完善《ICSID公约》的规定,详尽界定仲裁员缺乏独立性的情形,以确保仲裁员独立性的实现。 International investment dispute settlement arbitration system was constructed by the developed countries and the developing ones, which overcome the defect of diplomatic protection and local remedy. While, in the last few years there arises the legitimacy crisis in this system. Among which the problem of arbitrator" s independence is worth the whistle, because arbitrator is the judge of the dispute, the core of the whole procedure, and the guarantee of equity. Thus, a permanent arbitrator group should be constructed to avoid interest conflict between the arbitrator and the dispute parties. Meanwhile, ICSID convention should be perfected to contain detail regulation about the meaning of "independence', so that arbitrator's independence can be realized.