机构地区: 广西财经学院金融与保险学院金融系
出 处: 《浙江工商大学学报》 2011年第3期52-58,共7页
摘 要: 次贷危机之后,动态调整的逆周期监管政策似乎可以成为缓解信贷顺周期的重要措施之一。然而,这种相机抉择的监管方法却有可能对银行体系和实体经济产生新的干扰。当政策效果存在明显时滞且未来经济不确定性增大时,监管部门应该在增强宏观经济预测能力的前提下慎重采用相机抉择的逆周期监管政策。 After subprime crisis, dynamically counter-cyclical policy seems to be one of important measures to reduce credit proeyclicality. However, discretional supervision perhaps cast influence to banking system and real economy. When time lags exist and economic uncertainties increase, supervisor should cautiously adopt counter-cyclical supervision before improve capability to forecast macro-economy.
领 域: [经济管理]