作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 广东外语外贸大学国际商务英语学院

出　　处： 《语言教学与研究》 2011年第3期87-94,共8页

摘　　要： 本文将评价理论和顺应论有机结合,建立了一个介入资源顺应分析模式,用来分析律师代理词中介入资源的使用规律并解释律师如何动态地选择介入资源以顺应语境,最终实现交际目的。研究发现,代理词中使用较多的介入资源有否定、反驳、背书、接纳、承认等资源。而这些介入资源是律师为了顺应法官和听众的接受心理、律师自己的心理动机、法庭言语规范、庭审各方权力关系而做出的语言选择。其中,反驳、接纳、背书、承认多是对心理世界的顺应,否定、接纳、背书多是对社交世界的顺应。但在交际中,律师不会只考虑顺应一种因素,而往往是三种因素共同起作用。此外,在交际中,律师所选择的语言顺应并不是固定不变的,而是随着交际的进展、事态的发展以及交际双方关系的变化随时做出动态的调整。 By integrating the pragmatic Adaptation Theory with the this paper constructs an analytical model of Adaptation analysis of Engag systemic Appraisal Theory, ement resources. This mod- el is employed to anaIyze the regularities of using Engagement resources in lawyer representation and to explicate how they are used to adapt to contextual correlates and actualize their communicative goals in the final analysis. The study reveals that in lawyer representation Engagement resources such as Deny, Counter, Endorse, Entertain, and Acknowledge are amply employed by lawyers to a- dapt to mental world and social world of judges, audience and their own. More specifically, re- sources like Counter, Entertain, Endorse, and Acknowledge are more likely to adapt to mental world, whilst Deny, Entertain, and Endorse also adapt to social world of courtroom speech norm and power relations. Moreover, the adaptive selections of Engagement resources are not on a one-to-one basis, but dynamically vary with changing contexts.

关 键 词： 律师代理词 介入资源 顺应论

领　　域： [语言文字]