帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

不同学习方式下归类不确定时的特征推理
Influence of Category Learning in Feature Predicting When Categories Are Uncertain

作  者: ; ;

机构地区: 华南师范大学教育科学学院心理应用研究中心

出  处: 《心理学报》 2011年第1期92-100,共9页

摘  要: 采用学习-迁移模式,探讨了同时学习和继时学习两种方式下归类不确定时的特征推理。共包括2个实验,其中实验1探讨了固定学习轮次的情况,实验2探讨了固定学习正确率的情况。实验结果表明:同时呈现类别要素的同时学习方式下,被试习得序列式的单类别表征(原型表征),在归类不确定时的特征推理中按照"单类的Bayesian规则"进行特征推理,即P(j\F)=P(k\F)·P(j\k);相继呈现类别要素的继时学习方式下,被试习得并列式的多类别表征,在归类不确定时的特征推理中按照"理性模型"进行推理,即P(j\F)=ΣkP(k\F)·P(j\k)。 This paper studies how feature prediction is influenced by two types of category learning at uncertain classifying circumstance. One type of learning is stimulus by stimulus and another is category by category. Anderson (1991) provided a Bayesian analysis on feather predicting when categories are uncertain. For each object containing features F and each category k, one can predict the presence of a novel feature j by using the formula: P(j/F) =∑kP(k/F)·P(j、k). That is, one calculates for the object how likely it is to be in each category k and how likely that category is to contain the property in question. Then one sums across all the categories in order to make the prediction. In short, this proposal is that people use multiple categories to make predictions when the categorization is uncertain. Murphy & Ross (1994) argued that people make category-based inductions basing on only one category, even when they are not certain that the object is in that category. They found that even if participants give a fairly low rating of their confidence in the category it does not lead them to use multiple categories at making prediction. That is, one can predict the presence of a novel feature j by using the formula: P(j/F) =P(k/F)·P(j/k). The experiments used the learning-transfer-paradigm which has three phases: learning phase, filler phaseand transfer phase. 244 participants took part in two experiments. In experiment 1, participants stopped learning until they completed 4 blocks (64 trials), and in experiment 2 until they reached an accuracy of combination of 80%. In learning phase there were two learning ways: one was stimulus by stimulus (experiment lb and 2b) and another was categories by categories (experiment 1a and 1b) and participants reacted basing on conditions and received feedback from tester. In transfer phase participants conducted same task as learning phase except that no feedback was given during transfer. The results in experiment

关 键 词: 类别学习 特征推理 单类说 理性模型 贝叶斯推理

领  域: [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教]

相关作者

作者 徐明慧
作者 王墨耘
作者 牛翠波
作者 袁继红

相关机构对象

机构 华南师范大学教育科学学院心理学系
机构 华南师范大学
机构 华南师范大学政治与行政学院
机构 广东外语外贸大学政治与公共管理学院应用心理管理系
机构 广东财经大学

相关领域作者

作者 张玉普
作者 张蕾蕾
作者 张馨文
作者 徐敏
作者 施群丽