作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学管理学院

出　　处： 《管理科学》 2010年第4期86-94,共9页

摘　　要： 针对供应链中契约与信任、权威与信任之间的治理作用是互补还是替代关系的争论,对不同治理机制选择与供应链信息系统价值创造的关系进行梳理,运用博弈分析方法探讨组合与单一治理机制选择对供应链信息系统价值创造的影响,通过25家企业的实地调查对博弈分析结论进行讨论。研究表明,当环境不确定性较高时,采用契约与信任、权威与信任组合治理比采用单一契约或权威治理对供应链信息系统价值创造的促进作用更大;当环境不确定性较低时,采用契约与信任、权威与信任组合治理比采用单一信任治理的促进作用更大;当环境不确定性处于中间状态时,难以确定上述组合与单一治理两者的优劣。 In view of arguments on substitutional or complementry relationships between formal contract governance and trust gov- ernance as well as power governance and trust governance in supply chain, this study clarifies the relationship between the choice of governance mechanism and supply chain information system value creation. With the development of a game model, we discusses the effect of single or combining governance mechanism on value creation of supply chain information system. Through field study of 25 enterprises with game theory analysis, the results show that, to enhance the supply chain information system value creation, the combining governance mechanism, formal contract and trust governance as well as power and trust governance, is better than single governance mechanism, the single formal contract as well as power governance, when the environment is in higher uncertainty, meanwhile, the effect of combining governance mechanism is better than single governance mechanism when the environment is in lower uncertainty. However, it is very hard to determine single governance mechanism is better than combining governance mechanism or not when environmental uncertainty is at medium level.

关 键 词： 供应链信息系统 治理机制 组合治理 价值创造

领　　域： [经济管理] [社会学]