机构地区: 广东外语外贸大学
出 处: 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2010年第2期91-95,共5页
摘 要: 本文从讨论减轻概念出发,论述被告人在体现控辩双方非对称性权力关系的法庭交际中,为了减轻自己的罪行或开脱自己的责任,采取既合作又抵制的策略原则,常常使用减轻策略,指出该策略的使用对其信息提供产生了直接的影响。本文通过应用Martinovski的庭审减轻策略的分析框架,分析被告人如何在答话中采取减轻策略而导致的信息不足、信息过量和信息缺失,还分析了被告人的加重辩护过程。最后指出被告人提供信息的过程是一个动态平衡的过程。 This paper, starting with a discussion of "mitigation", examines how the defendant, in courtroom interaction featuring an asymmetrical power relationship between prosecution and defense, adopts the strategic principle of both cooperation and resistance and thus tends to employ mitigation strategies, for the purpose of reducing his crime or denying his liability. It points out that the use of these strategies has a direct impact on the defendant's information supply. Finally, this paper, by applying Martinovski's analytical framework of"mitigation in courts", analyzes how the defendant's mitigation strategies in his answers and replies lead to information deficiency, glut and absence, adding that the defendant may also use the process of aggravation in his defense. It concludes that the process of information supply by the defendant is dynamic.