作 者: ;
机构地区: 吉林大学行政学院
出 处: 《辽东学院学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第2期120-126,共7页
摘 要: 冷战结束后,意识形态因素在国家外交决策中的价值导引和知觉定位的作用非但没有完全消减,反而有所增强。美俄日韩对朝鲜的生存与发展的知觉认知形成了三种典型的推断,即美日的"朝鲜威胁论"、俄罗斯的"朝鲜负担论"以及韩国的"朝鲜崩溃论"。固执地坚守以意识形态为引导的冷战思维必然导致对国际环境与国际关系的错误知觉,甚至会产生国家间关系的严重敌视或是对抗。历史传统和地缘现实决定了中国必须理性对待朝鲜,要力避错误知觉,确立起战略思维,并放眼于长远和未来,从和平、发展与合作的角度,稳步构建起中朝之间的正常国家关系。 After the cold war,the role of ideological factors for value guide and perception orientation in the national diplomatic decision has strengthened.Based on the perception cognition of the U.S,Russia,Japan and South Korea about the survival and development of North Korea,three typical conclusions are drawn,that is,the North Korea Threat statement of the U.S and Japan,the North Korea Burden statement of Russia and the North Korea Collapse statement of South Korea.It reveals that a stubbornly sticking to the cold war thinking which is guided by ideology will inevitably lead to misperception in international environment and international relations and even cause serious hostile or confrontation among nations.Owing to the historical tradition and geopolitical reality,China should take North Korea rationally and avoid the error perception.It should establish a strategic thinking and take a broad and long-term view.In view of peace,development and cooperation,China and North Korea should steadily build up a normal bilateral relationship.