作 者: ;
机构地区: 天津师范大学历史文化学院
出 处: 《史学史研究》 2009年第4期91-105,共15页
摘 要: 南宋州郡志与北宋闰年图、图经等的本质区别,在于后者属于王朝自上而下的地理资料汇集制度;前者则是地方州郡的自觉行为,是"自下而不上"的修纂活动。这种转变在使州郡志逐渐从地方地理变化为地方典籍的同时,也使修纂活动成为地方官、文人、缙绅的政治与文化舞台。其中,地方官处于主导地位,他们对于州郡志的热心,并非简单地地方势力兴起、乡邦之热爱等,而往往体现了其自觉的政治意识。而文人、缙绅在其中所扮演的角色多样而复杂,就才学而言,多长于考订,这在相当的程度上成为南宋以后,州郡志大量地增加文学内容,而技术部分日益没落的重要因素。 The basic differenrce between Run nian tu(闰年图 ) or Tujing(图经) of the Northern Song Dynasty and Zhoujun zhi (州郡志 ) of the Southern Song Dynasty was that the former was a system of collection of geography resources of the Empire which was top-down, while the latter was a conscious activity of some local governments on the bottom level. This made Zhoujun zhi local texts rather than geography books. At the same time, the compilation became political and cultural stages of the local bureaucrats, confucian scholars and gentlemen. The local bureaucrats, among others, palyed the leading role, and their enthusiasm in such action was not smiply due to the rise of the local forces, or topophilia, but also to their conscious political awareness. The roles of the confucian scholars and local gentlemen were diverse and complicated. As far as their abilities were concerned, they were good at textual researches. This was an important factor to some extent for much literary and less technical contents in Zhoujun zhi after the Southern Song Dynasty.
领 域: [历史地理]