作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 西南大学政治与公共管理学院逻辑与智能研究中心

出　　处： 《哲学研究》 2009年第10期53-60,共8页

摘　　要： In this essay,the indeterminacy of interpretation is that when we construct belief and meaning,the significantly different theories of truth,which based on the formal and empirical restrictions,will fit the evidence equally well,and,hence,that there will be equally competitive but different theories of interpretation,theories which capture equally well the speaker’s dispositions.Some philosophers argued that,the indeterminacy of interpretation is unacceptable,for it conflicts with the obvious determinacy of self-knowledge.We will explore the problem based on Davidson’s Program,and claim that this conflict is surface but not a real one.From then on,we clarify the significance of the indeterminacy thesis of interpretation in philosophy. In this essay,the indeterminacy of interpretation is that when we construct belief and meaning,the significantly different theories of truth,which based on the formal and empirical restrictions,will fit the evidence equally well,and,hence,that there will be equally competitive but different theories of interpretation,theories which capture equally well the speaker's dispositions.Some philosophers argued that,the indeterminacy of interpretation is unacceptable,for it conflicts with the obvious determinacy of self-knowledge.We will explore the problem based on Davidson's Program,and claim that this conflict is surface but not a real one.From then on,we clarify the significance of the indeterminacy thesis of interpretation in philosophy.

关 键 词： 自我知识 诠释 不确定性问题 语言翻译 科学理论 经验证据 语言哲学 论题

领　　域： [哲学宗教] [哲学宗教] [自动化与计算机技术] [自动化与计算机技术]