作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广州大学法学院

出　　处： 《环球法律评论》 2009年第4期81-89,共9页

摘　　要： 在近代刑事诉讼发展史上,日本从卷证移送主义转向了起诉书一本主义。在排除预断、防止偏见和构造庭审当事人主义两大预定目标上,日本起诉书一本主义的确发挥了作用,但作用有限。其作用的有限性体现在这种转向以损害实体真实和诉讼效率为代价,而为此进行的改革仍然存在两难境遇方面。由此,日本在移植起诉书一本主义中的经验和教训对我国公诉方式改革是有启发意义的。 In modern history of the development of criminal prosecution, Japan has adopted the principle of only indictment while abolishing the principle of removal of evidence. In achieving the expected objectives, such as elimination of prejudgment, prevention of bias and the establishment of adversary system, the principle of only indictment does play a positive role. However, it has its limitations. For example, the cost of encroachment on substantive truth and lack of lawsuit efficiency. The reform carried out in this respect is still facing dilemma in Japan. The Japanese experience and lessons learned in transplanting the principle of only indictment is of reference value to China in our reform of criminal prosecution mode.

关 键 词： 起诉书一本主义 卷证移送主义 实体真实 程序公平

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律] [经济管理]