作 者: ;
机构地区: 中山职业技术学院
出 处: 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2009年第5期79-81,共3页
摘 要: 今本《关雎》最后两章颇难解读,多有争议,且此诗章句的排列与其它诗歌表现出来的规律不同,似有错乱,但在现存文献里却找不到证据。唯上博楚简所论之《关雎》疑与今本不同。 The last two sections in Twittering Birds are difficult to understand, which are interpreted differently by scholars. The lines are organized differently comparing with other poems,which seems irregular. However, evidence is not available in documents. The bamboo vetsion stored in Shanghai Museum seems different from the popular version.
领 域: [文学]