作 者: ;
机构地区: 韶关学院体育学院
出 处: 《武汉体育学院学报》 2009年第4期18-22,共5页
摘 要: 实证和思辨研究是当今体育人文社会学研究经常运用的两种范式,二者存在哲学基础、研究目的、认识事物的程度、选题类型、研究结果的表达方式等方面的差异。同时,二者都存在自身不足。实证范式的不足包括体现不了科学的导向功能、忽视研究中的价值、可能导致以偏概全以及程序和方法僵化等;思辨范式的不足是信度低下、难以创新。体育人文社会学实证和思辨研究范式之间存在整合的可行性,实地研究为二者的整合提供了途径。 Positivism and speculative researches are two paradigms widely used in sports humanities and sociology researches. They are different in philosophical bases, research purposes, realization of things, research topics and demonstration of research results etc. Both have their weaknesses. Positivism cannot be scientific guidance with ignorance of values in researches, which can lead to prejudice, rigid procedure and methods. While speculative researches are hard to be innovative and be valid. In this paper, ways of integrating the two paradigms are proposed.