作　　者： ;

机构地区： 江苏大学人文社会科学学院

出　　处： 《毕节学院学报（综合版）》 2009年第2期56-63,共8页

摘　　要： 李定广先生回护旧说,认为拙文《正诠》释"博徒"、"四异"为"褒美之词","观点虽新却失真","属断章取义的曲解",并认为刘勰在《楚辞》的评价上"存在深刻的矛盾"。笔者立足于《辩骚篇》文本的精细解读,反省自己,参酌时贤,据理商榷,多层次、多角度、全方位论定"博徒"、"四异"仍是"褒词"。刘勰将"博徒"与"英杰"对喻《楚辞》,正好体现了《楚辞》"四同"、"四异"思想与艺术的审美特征。此乃刘勰理想的创作原则与境界。故刘勰力荐《楚辞》为后世诗赋创作之典范。《辨骚篇》"博徒"、"四异"终究是"褒词"。 Li holds the view that ＂Bo Tu＂ and ＂Si Yi＂ cannot be considered as commendatory words and my argument is new but beyond truth. And he thought Liu Xie＇ s comments on ＂Chu Ci＂ contain deep controversy. Then after reading the text carefully and consult enough evidences, the author still considers the two words to be commendatory. ＂Bo Tu＂ and ＂Si Yi＂ are well representative of Chu Ci＇ s aethetics, which . i are the ideal principles of creation, so Liu recommends Chu ci as the model of the later poems. The two words in ＂Bian Sao＂ essay are still commendatory.

关 键 词： 刘勰 辨骚 博徒 四异 褒词 典范

领　　域： [文学]