作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广州大学法学院

出　　处： 《河北法学》 2008年第11期148-151,共4页

摘　　要： 诱惑侦查手段在犯罪侦查中存在合法性不足的问题,在实践中的运行处于封闭状态,不符合侦查法治化原则。学界对诱惑侦查合法性界定的"两分法"标准存在缺陷,不能合理地解决诱惑侦查手段在毒品犯罪侦查中的合法性及被告人的刑事责任问题,对诱惑侦查合法性标准实行"三分法",可以较好弥补"两分法"标准的不足。最后以"数量引诱"和"打预谋"侦查方法为例,分析其合法性及其刑事责任。 Temptation investigative techniques in the criminal investigation in the lack of legitimacy, in practice the operation in a closed state, the investigation did not meet the principles of the rule of law. Academic investigation of the temptation to define the legitimacy＂of two＂standard shortcomings can not be rational solution to the temptation investigative techniques in drug-related crimes in the investigation of the legality of the issue and the criminal responsibility of the accused, the investigation of the legitimacy of standards temptation of ＂one-third Law＂can better make up for the＂dichotomy＂the lack of standards. Finally, ＂the number of temptations＂and＂a premeditated＂investigative methods as an example, the analysis of its legitimacy and its criminal responsibility.

关 键 词： 诱惑侦查 毒品犯罪 合法性

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]