机构地区: 中南大学资源与安全工程学院
出 处: 《采矿与安全工程学报》 2008年第2期132-138,共7页
摘 要: 在比较研究当前采空区探测的常用方法、适用范围及选用原则的基础上,针对洛钼集团栾川三道庄矿的采空区探测的实际情况和要求,提出了以高密度电法和地震映像法进行该矿区的采空区综合物探工作.对探测结果进行了相互比较分析,并与矿区已有钻孔资料进行了对比,结果表明探测方法本身技术的先进性、探测方法与实际情况的匹配度、对探测结果解释的正确程度以及辅助验证措施的配套度等是影响采空区探测结果精确度的关键因素. Aiming at the practical situation and requirement for goal detection of Luanchuan Sandaozhuang mine, Luomu Group, we compared the commonly used physical prospecting methods and their application in goal detection, discussed principles of selecting a suitable one of these methods, and proposed that the high density resistivity method and seismic imaging method should be used in this mine. The data obtained by these two methods were compared with the existing data of this mine, indicating that the advancement of the method used, the match degree of the method to practical situation, the correctness of data interpretation, and the verification are key factors affecting the precision of goal detection.