帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

侦查讯问犯罪嫌疑人的正当法律程序——以权利与权力的适度平衡为视角
Due Process of Law for Interrogation in Criminal Investigation——From the angle of proper balance between right and power

作  者: ;

机构地区: 上海交通大学法学院

出  处: 《河北法学》 2008年第1期129-135,共7页

摘  要: 作为一种重要的刑事侦查方法,讯问犯罪嫌疑人的行为直接反映诉讼程序的公正程度并最终影响诉讼结果的正当性。犯罪嫌疑人的主体尊严和人权保障的人道诉求,对侦查权力的理性运行寄予了最基本的期待。根据国际刑事司法准则的要求,赋予犯罪嫌疑人必要的知情权、反对自我归罪权、及时获得律师帮助权和免受酷刑是侦查讯问正当法律程序的底限公正基准。域外关于侦查讯问的正当法律程序成功范例以及我国侦查权力本位的程序运行经验教训表明,唯有以权利制约权力,才是防止侦查权力的滥用,保护涉讼公民基本人权的有效途径。让犯罪嫌疑人享有基本的防御权利,使个人权利和国家权力之间达到适度平衡,是我国侦查讯问正当法律程序的必然走向。 Interrogation is one of investigating ways in criminal cases, which has a great influence on the fairness and equity of criminal process. According to the principle of innocence of presumption, the suspect's basic human rights should be respected by the official investigators. Any suspect being interrogated shall have the right to know the nature and reason of accusation, the right against self-incrimination, the right to have the assistance of counsel for his defense and no torture and unusual punishments inflicted according to the requirements of due process of law stipulated by international covenants and universal declarations. The criminal suspect' s rights are usually guaranteed by due process of law in those countries and regions with the tradition of Rule of Law, but the opposite situation exists in current China. In order to prohibit all kinds of inhumane interrogating by way of power abuse, the suspect should have the basic rights of defense in the interrogation. The essence of due process of law for interrogation in criminal investigation in future China is to keep proper balance between individual right and investigative power.

关 键 词: 侦查 讯问 犯罪嫌疑人 正当程序 平衡

领  域: [政治法律] [政治法律]

相关作者

作者 蔡国芹
作者 陈世革
作者 唐兢
作者 韦亚君
作者 杜宝庆

相关机构对象

机构 广东警官学院
机构 广东警官学院侦查系
机构 中山大学法学院
机构 广东司法警官职业学院
机构 中山大学

相关领域作者

作者 康秋实
作者 廖伟导
作者 廖芳
作者 张万坤
作者 张光亚