机构地区: 广东工业大学艺术设计学院
出 处: 《中国心理卫生杂志》 2007年第8期539-543,共5页
摘 要: 目的:探讨普通高校和民办高校大学生的自我概念。方法:采用罗夏测验和田纳西自我概念量表对61名普通高校和民办高校的大学生的自我概念进行测试。结果:(1)罗夏测验自我概念变量具有较好的信度,11个与自我概念有关的变量总的α系数为0.723;(2)普通高校纯粹人类内容反应与其他人类内容反应的比值低于民办高校(1.1±1.1/1.4±1.2,Z=-0.919,P=0.358),其他变量的得分均高于民办高校,如映像反应(1.1±1.1/0.5±1.2,Z=-2.849,P=0.004)、形状-维度反应(1.9±1.6/1.0±1.1,Z=-2.459,P=0.014;1.1±1.1/0.6±0.9,Z=-2.204,P=0.028)、病理内容(4.2±2.9/2.4±2.4,Z=-2.888,P=0.004)、人类内容反应(5.1±3.3/2.7±2.5,Z=-3.037,P=0.002)、人类体验(1.8±2.2/0.7±1.1,Z=-2.776,P=0.006)等;(3)对罗夏测验自我概念变量进行因素分析,得到内省、积极关注、现实感和消极关注四个因子,方差累积贡献率为67.82%。结论:罗夏测验自我概念变量比较敏感,能够避开参与者的认知审查,可以对自我概念进行较好的测量。 Objective: To explore the Self-concept. of students in private and pubhc colleges. Method: Rorschach Inkblot Method and Tennessee Self - concept Scale were used to assess the self - concept of 61 college students. Result: ( 1 ) The Rorschach self - concept variables have good reliability, the total α of 11 Rorschach Self - concept Variables is 0. 723. ( 2 ) Private college students were significantly different from public college students on the majority of the Rorschach self - concept variables, including Fr + rF ( 1.1 ±1.1/0. 5 ± 1.2, Z = - 2. 849, P = 0.004), FD (1.9±1.6/1.0±1.1, Z =-2.459, P=0.014), SumV (1.1 ±1.1/0.6+0.9, Z =-2.204, P =0.028), MOR (4.2±2.9/2.4±2.4, Z = -2.888, P=0.004), Hd+ (H) + (Hd) (5.1 ±3.3/2.7± 2. 5, Z =-3.037, P=0.002 )Hx (1.8±2.2/0.7±1.1, Z = -2.776, P=0.006); However, it showed no significant differences in self-report scale. (3) Principal components analysis got four factors, such as introspection, positive regard, sense of reality and negative self - regard in self - concept of Rorschach test, which four factors could explain 67. 82% of total variance. Conclusion: The Rorschaeh self - concept variables are sensitive and they could avoid the pretence and defense of the participants.