作　　者： ;

机构地区： 华南师范大学文学院岭南文化研究中心

出　　处： 《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 2007年第2期63-65,共3页

摘　　要： 甲骨文“毓”旧读为“后”,这种读法缺乏理据,甲骨文本有“后”字,“毓”当如字读。花园庄东地甲骨“”的释读有多种意见,应释定为“亡后”,读为“亡咎”,“无祸”之义。“以日为名”的商人庙号确定依据众说纷纭,以前的各种说法对商王世次都有难以解释的问题,而曹定云先生提出的“宗族行第”说更近情理,能较好地解决“上甲、报乙、报丙、报丁、示壬、示癸”日名顺序的巧合问题。 In old times,the pronunciation of the Chinese character毓 was the same as the character后in the oracle bone inscription.This paper holds that this interpretation is unreasonable and lacks grounds.The character 后existed originally in bone inscription,and so 毓 can't be pronounced as后.毓祖乙 can be explained as a Zuyi which is the closest to me.多毓can be explained as many ancestors,direct ancestors.There are diverse interpretation of in the Hua Yuan Zhuang Dong Di Oracle Bone inscriptions.The paper believes that should be explained as 亡后and be pronounced as 亡咎 and it means无祸.The ground for naming their firms after the date has been controversial.The paper holds that the old pronunciation and interpretation can even solve the problem of the order of the kings of the Shang Dynasty.Among such diverse opinions Mr.Cao Dingyun's idea should be the closest to the historical fact.

关 键 词： 卜辞 毓 后 亡后 以日为名

领　　域： [语言文字]