作　　者： ;

机构地区： 湖南省第一师范学校

出　　处： 《湖南第一师范学报》 2006年第4期59-61,66,共4页

摘　　要： 评分标准在写作测试中非常重要,使用不同的评分方法会影响评卷者的评分行为。研究显示,虽然整体法和分析法两种英语写作评分方法都可靠,但是在两种评分中,评卷者的严厉程度以及考生的写作成绩发生很大变化。总体上,整体法评分中,评卷者的严厉程度趋于一致,接近理想值;分析法评分中,考生的写作成绩更高,同时评卷者的严厉程度也存在显著差异。因而,在决定考生前途命运的重大考试中,整体评分法更受推崇。 Rating scales are of special importance in writing assessment. Different scoring methods will exert different influence on the scores test takers receive from the raters. Research results indicate that both holistic and analytic scoring methods were reliable, but there were great changes in the raters＇ severity estimates and the scores the candidates received across the two kinds of ratings. Generally speaking, raters produced more uniform ratings and they were neither severe nor lenient to the candidates when they employed the holistic scoring method; while in the analytic ratings, candidates, on the whole, received higher grades, meanwhile, the raters differed significantly in their severity. Hence, we can come to the conclusion that the holistic scoring method is preferable over the analytie one in high-stakes assessment.

关 键 词： 大学英语 整体评分法 分析评分法 写作测试

领　　域： [文化科学] [文化科学]