作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 广州大学法学院

出　　处： 《环球法律评论》 2006年第6期692-697,共6页

摘　　要： 本文着眼于中德两国金融诈骗犯罪的立法设置,分别从行为模式以及主观要素两方面分析了两国刑法规范所体现出的各自特点。通过分析比较两国金融诈骗罪行为模式的不同,澄清了目前学界对此问题的相关误解,提出我国不必对金融诈骗罪选择危险犯或行为犯的行为模式;在主观要素方面,我国金融诈骗罪采取直接故意,而德国刑法采取有条件故意,二者在认识因素上存在不同。 This article focuses on the legislative design relating to the crime of financial fraud in China and Germany, analyzes the characteristics of relevant criminal norms in the two countries from the perspectives of behavior pattern and subjective elements. Through the comparison of different modes of the crime of financial fraud in the two countries, the authors clear up many misunderstandings in this area in Chinese academic circle and propose that China does not have to adopt the behavior pattern of potential damage offense or behavioral offense for the crime of financial fraud. The two countries also adopted different attitude towards the subjective element of financial fraud crime ： China has adopted the mode of direct intent, whereas Germany adopted the mode of conditional intent.

关 键 词： 金融诈骗 行为模式 直接故意 有条件的故意

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]