作　　者： ;

机构地区： 北京大学法学院

出　　处： 《环球法律评论》 2006年第5期551-556,共6页

摘　　要： 非法证据排除规则的范围应当限定在以侵犯相关人基本权利的手段获取的证据,“毒树之果”不应属于排除范围。非法证据的排除只应限定在该证据在证明被告人有罪方面不具有可采性,其效力并不及于其他方面。非法证据排除规则的运行,有赖于“二元式”裁判结构的建立;有赖于科学的动议、听证和裁判程序的建立;有赖于证明责任的合理分配。 What Kind of Exclusion Rule of Evidence Illegally Obtained Do We Need in Chinese Criminal Procedure？ The exclusion rule of evidence illegally obtained should be limited in those evidences which have been obtained by the measures violating the protection of fundamental rights authorized by constitutional law, so “the fruits of poisonous tree” should not be excluded. The exclusion of evidence illegally obtained means that it can not be used as an evidence of guilt ; however it doesn＇ t mean it can not be used in other aspects. The operation of exclusion rule of evidence illegally obtained relies on the establishment of “dual structure” of trial and judgment, the procedures of scientific motivation, hearing and verdict, and the reasonable distribution of burden of proof.

关 键 词： 非法证据 排除 基本权利 毒树之果 裁判结构 证明责任

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]