作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学人文科学学院逻辑与认知研究所

出　　处： 《哲学研究》 2006年第10期102-108,共7页

摘　　要： Beginning in 1940’s, as a matter of fact, philosophers, such as Strawson, Austin, Searle, etc, focused on the pragmatic elements in assessing arguments. Toulmin (1958) presents a dialectical model called Toulmin Model different from classical model, which tries to describe the structure of argument as process. However, it is pity that their works had little on the formal semantics developed by Richard Montague and his followers until the rise of Informal Logic (in North America), Pragma-Dialectics (in Holland), and Radical Argumentativism (in France). This paper tries first to evaluate Formal Logical Model, Informal Logical Model and Pragma-dialectical Model of argumentation evaluation, and then construct a Defeasible Pragma-Dialectical Model by introducing Defeasible Modus Ponens rule in order to evaluate a real argument as process in everyday life. Beginning in 1940’s, as a matter of fact, philosophers, such as Strawson, Austin, Searle, etc, focused on the pragmatic elements in assessing arguments. Toulmin (1958) presents a dialectical model called Toulmin Model different from classical model, which tries to describe the structure of argument as process. However, it is pity that their works had little on the formal semantics developed by Richard Montague and his followers until the rise of Informal Logic (in North America), Pragma-Dialectics (in Holland), and Radical Argumentativism (in France). This paper tries first to evaluate Formal Logical Model, Informal Logical Model and Pragma-dialectical Model of argumentation evaluation, and then construct a Defeasible Pragma-Dialectical Model by introducing Defeasible Modus Ponens rule in order to evaluate a real argument as process in everyday life.

关 键 词： 论证 逻辑分析 自然语言 评价 交际行为 交互作用 哈贝马斯 种类

领　　域： [哲学宗教]