作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 吉林大学法学院

出　　处： 《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》 2006年第3期81-83,共3页

摘　　要： 我国的法院调解兼具司法与替代性解纷机制两种特征,从ADR的角度看法院调解,法院调解与其他非诉解纷机制一样具有相同的制度补充机能,也完全可以主动用来将正义因素吸收进法治体系中,并增加法治中的自治因素。在宏观结构上对于法院调解制度所作的正当性论证,还有助于从微观层面上切实地设计出可行的具体操作规范,在合意性和效益性之外,强调其差异性、科学化和自治性,以改善以往实践中的不利因素。 Court conciliation in China carries two specific features： judicial act and substituted mediation of disputes. In fact, court conciliation possesses the same supplementary function as other non-accused mediation if we refer to the broad sense of ADR. The just factors in court conciliation is possible to be absorbed to increase the self-governing components in legal systems. Moreover, the proper conclusion of court conciliation from macrostructure analysis is helpful to design practical and effective operation standards in details. Besides the suitable and beneficial contents in the conciliation, we should emphasis its peculiar, scientific and self-governing natures in order to avoid the disadvantages in practical operations.

关 键 词： 法院调解制度 自治 实验机制

领　　域： [经济管理]