作　　者： ;

机构地区： 江苏大学人文社会科学学院

出　　处： 《钦州师范高等专科学校学报》 2006年第2期22-28,共7页

摘　　要： 李定广先生回护旧说,认为《〈辨骚篇〉“博徒”“四异”正诠》释“博徒”、“四异”为“褒美之词”,“观点虽新却失真”,“属断章取义的曲解”,并认为刘勰在《楚辞》的评价上“存在深刻的矛盾”。但只要精细解读,参酌时贤,“博徒”、“四异”仍是“褒词”。刘勰将“博徒”与“英杰”对喻《楚辞》,正好体现了《楚辞》“四同”、“四异”思想与艺术的审美特征。此乃刘勰所理想的创作原则与境界。故刘勰力荐《楚辞》为后世诗赋创作之典范。《辨骚篇》“博徒”、“四异”终究是“褒词”。 In his paper, Mr Li Dian - guang had suggested that the Terms as ＂gamester＂, ＂four differences＂ I looked up them as the commendatory terms in my paper Correcting Paraphrase are new but wrong and are misunderstood, what is more that there existed sharp disagreements on Liu Xie＇s assessment of Chu Ci. The paper, on the basis of refined reading of On Li Shao and on self - examination, requiring the authority, proof - seeking, still believe in my opinions that these terms are commendatory terms on earth concluded from all kinds of dimensions, especially upon Liu Xie＇s thought and art aesthetic characteristics, composing principles and artistic image in his similar comparisons with ＂gamesters＂ and ＂heroes＂. And we all are well known that Liu Xie recommended Chu Ci was the example of the poetry and poetic essay for the backward ages.

关 键 词： 刘勰 辨骚 博徒 四异 褒词 典范

领　　域： [文学]