作　　者： ;

机构地区： 中山大学法学院

出　　处： 《现代法学》 2006年第2期107-115,共9页

摘　　要： 想象竞合犯具有多个犯罪的社会危害性,对其“从一重罪”处断不能实现罪刑公正。当一个自然行为蕴含多个危害行为的意义时,构成多个危害行为的竞合,其实质是危害行为的复数。行为竞合的概念,在理论上不仅可能,而且正当。想象竞合犯实质上是复数危害行为的竞合,该复数危害行为分别符合复数的犯罪构成,属于实质的数罪。应当对想象竞合犯数罪并罚,这不仅是其罪数本质的要求,也是罪刑法定、罪刑公正的要求。 It is unfair that an imaginary coincidental offense, consisting of certain social harm elements and punishable by several sanctions, is punished only in accordance with one count that is deemed the most serious one. Where an act is composed of more than one harmful element, concurrence of harmful behaviors, or plural perpetrating acts occur. The concept of concurrence of plural acts is theoretically acceptable and reasonable. The essence of imaginary coincidental offense is concurrence of plural perpetrating acts, which are composed of several counts and fall within the scope of substantive crimes. Imaginary plural crimes should be punished by combined punishment for more than one crime, which is not only consistent with the essence of the coincidental offense, but with the principle of nullun crimen sine lege, thus to make the punishment fit the crime.

关 键 词： 想象竞舍犯 行为竞合 实质数罪 数罪并罚

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]