作　　者： ;

机构地区： 广东海洋大学

出　　处： 《广东行政学院学报》 2005年第6期20-24,65,共6页

摘　　要： 发生在清朝末年的同治中兴,虽在形式上保全了清政府君主专制中央集权的政权组织形式,但其政治体制模式却遭到结构性破坏———中央集权权力向地方督抚下移,而中兴所倚重的中兴名臣仍然抱持儒家封建政治伦理,造成清末政治体制模式与政治伦理相互悖离,双方均失去了在政治建设中的合法性和积极意义。其矛盾运动的结果,使中国近代社会政治新陈代谢的过程曲折而漫长,甚至迂回不前,并出现晚清政局特有的征象。 The Tongzhi Resurgence happened in the late Ching D- maintained the political organization mode of centralist absolute monarchy in shape, but its regime pattern was destroyed structurally - some statist power was transferred to lower local regime. Those famous ministers, mainstays of the Resurgence, still held Confucian feudal political ethics. This situation resulted in political ethics deviating from political regime pattern in the late Ching D-; both sides lost the legality and positivism in political building. The antinomy followed that the course remained long, flexuous even round balky in modern Chinese society metabolism, finally appeared the late Manching＇s particularly political symptoms.

关 键 词： 同治中兴 中兴名臣 政治体制模式 政治伦理 悖离

领　　域： [政治法律] [政治法律]