作　　者： ;

机构地区： 福建师范大学文学院

出　　处： 《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2005年第4期27-34,共8页

摘　　要： 在文学历史的实际发展和生成过程中,文学思潮与文学运动既有相同性,又有不同性。它们之间有时可以构成“互文”关系,有时却难以以对方作为表述的替代物。文学思潮与文学运动的同异,既表现在范畴、过程、呈现形式和目的、趋向、功能、影响等方面,也渗透在对象性、对象化方式、选择过程和研究方式与方法论等方面。正是这些相互夹缠的种种因素,决定并制约着对文学思潮与文学运动差异性进行阐释的复杂性和有效性。文学思潮与文学运动的相同性主要体现在范畴广延性的相似、“群体性”、“普遍性”等特性的相似、过程的相似和功能的相似等等方面。文学思潮与文学运动的不同性在于:发生过程的不同,发生方式的不同,文学史意义的不同。 In the actual development and generation of literary history, literary trends and literary movements were both similar and different. Sometimes they showed a relationship of “epanorthosis” but at other times neither could be the opposite’s substitute of expression. Similarities and differences between literary thends and literary movements showed themselves not only in category, process and purpose, tendency, function, effects and whatever of expressing forms but also in objectivity, means of objectification, process of selection, means of study and methodology. It is just these entangled factors that determine and dominate the complexity and effectiveness with regard to interpretation of differences between literary trends and literary movements. Likewise, the similarities between literary trends and literary movements are in categorical denotation, in “collectivity”, “universality” and whatever, in process and in function while the differences between them are in process and way of occurrence and in meaning of literary history.

关 键 词： 文学思潮 文学运动 世纪中国文学

领　　域： [文学]