帮助 本站公告
您现在所在的位置:网站首页 > 知识中心 > 文献详情
文献详细Journal detailed

心境状态量表监测运动疲劳的评价研究
Evaluation of POMS-R for Monitoring Overtraining

作  者: ; ;

机构地区: 广州体育学院

出  处: 《北京体育大学学报》 2004年第8期1068-1069,1077,共3页

摘  要: 为评定修订心境状态量表(POMS-R)的信度和效度,并试图找出提示过度训练(OT)的参考值。在中小运动量期间,整群抽样调查广东省各专业运动队以评价量表内部一致性和结构效度,另在大中负荷训练后对部分运动队进行随访调查以确定POMS-R最佳参考值。结果表明:POMS-R的Cronbachalpha系数是0.9,因子分析析出7个因子,累计贡献率58.1%。对于自诉训练后有疲乏者,则当POMS总分大于130(男)135(女)提示有OT,其灵敏度为73.3%(男)90%(女),特异度为85%(男)、77%(女)。说明:POMS-R有较好信度和效度,对监测运动后疲乏者有无OT有一定价值。 The objective of the paper is to evaluate the revised profile of mood state (POMS-R) and try to find the cutoff point score of POMS-R for monitoring overtraining (OT). The simple cluster sampling of Guangdong professional sports teams during light load is used to evaluate the internal consistency and structural validity of POMS-R. The follow-up study is made to decide the cutoff point score of POMS-R in some sports teams during the heavy load of training. The result shows that cronbach alpha coefficient of POMS-R is 0.9; factor analysis with varimax rotation extracted a seven-factor solution accounting for 58.1% of the variance. A cutoff total score of POMS-R>130 (male) 135 (female) in fatigue athletes is determined to discriminate between OT and non-OT with a sensitivity of 73.3%(male), 80%(female) and a specificity of 90% (male), 76.9%(female). Thus, the conclusion is that POMS-R is reliable and valid, and also useful to monitor OT.

关 键 词: 心境状态 运动疲劳 过度训练

领  域: [文化科学] [文化科学]

相关作者

相关机构对象

相关领域作者

作者 庞菊香
作者 康超
作者 廖燕萍
作者 廖荆梅
作者 张丽娟