作　　者： ;

机构地区： 复旦大学中国语言文学系

出　　处： 《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》 2006年第5期741-743,共3页

摘　　要： 《孙子兵法》作为谋求战争胜利的指导书是一部言利之书,处处不离“算”,但它在言利的基础上提出“全”的概念,以最小损耗获得最大的战争效益,而所谓的损耗对象也包括战争的对手在内。这种追求效率的功利主义似乎导致了近于“仁”的实际结果,但绝对理性的功利观并不能成为行事的衡量指标,还必须考虑两点:功利主义能在多大程度上贯彻理性原则;单从效果看问题的弊端。 As an instructive book for getting triumph in war. The Art of War is advocating the interests. It always calls for 'calculating' but proposes the concept of 'entireness' based on 'pursuing interests' at the same time, which wants to get the most interests in war by using the least cost that includes his opponent. This kind of utilitarianism for pursuing interests almost brings about the result of 'Ren'. But the absolute rational utilitarian view cannot become a criterion to measure one's action, and the following two points must be considered: in what degree the utilitarianism could carry out the rational principle; the drawback that only view the problems from the effect.

关 键 词： 利 算 道 全 指标

领　　域： [文学]