作　　者： ; ;

机构地区： 中山大学

出　　处： 《中山大学学报（社会科学版）》 2001年第6期6-12,共7页

摘　　要： ８０年前，鲁迅针对《学衡》杂志第一期作出了对学衡派的评价，虽然学衡派并未正式对鲁迅言论进行反驳，但两者之间的矛盾一直存在。今天，重新反思这场论争，可以看到鲁迅与学衡派的分歧决非私人恩怨，而是分别代表了文化转折期相反相成的两种思想倾向以及对待传统文化的两种不同态度。前者站在全盘反传统基础上，希望通过引入西方现代文化．促进传统文化的革新，创造新文化；后者以中国文化为本位，以新人文主义思想为准绳，希望通过传统文化的复兴和中西文化的融合，促进中国文化的转型。站在２１世纪的开端．思考这两种文化选择的意义与局限，对于我们今后的研究，将会提供可贵的借鉴。 Lu Xun appraised the property of the School of the Critical Review(Xueheng Pai) in the view of The Critical Review(Xueheng) No. 1 80 years ago. The School of the Critical Review did not refute Lu Xun's words on formal occasions, but they were still in contradiction at all times. What lay behind the conflict between Lu Xun and the School of the Critical Review was not private resentment, but conflict of different ideological inclinations and two kinds of different attitude to traditional Chinese culture. The former was on the basis of full and thorough opposition to Chinese traditional culture. He wanted to speed up reforming of the traditional culture and to create new culture by introducing the modem western culture. The latter was based on the theory, in which Chinese culture was in the standard position and the new humanism was the yardstick. They wanted to speed up the transferring of Chinese culture by renewing traditional culture and fusing Chinese culture and the western culture. The authors want to offer a valuable use for today's reference after they think of the meanings and localization of their cultural choice in the beginning of 21st century.

关 键 词： 鲁迅 学衡 杂志 学衡派

领　　域： [文学]